Endometrial polyps: impact on reproductive function and clinical aspects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2026.1(105).4754

Keywords:

endometrial polyps, infertility, reproductive function, hysteroscopy, hormonal therapy, women of reproductive age

Abstract

Endometrial polyps (EP) are among the most common benign intrauterine lesions and may significantly affect female reproductive function. Despite their prevalence, clinical features, impact on fertility, and optimal management strategies remain insufficiently studied, particularly in postmenopausal women.

Aim - to evaluate the influence of EP on reproductive function and to assess their clinical characteristics, localization, and management in women of reproductive and postmenopausal age.

Materials and methods. A prospective comparative clinical study was conducted, involving 114 women aged 20-70 years with histologically confirmed EP. The Control group included 54 healthy women of reproductive age. Diagnostic methods included transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), sonohysterography, and office hysteroscopy with targeted biopsy. Polypectomy was performed using mechanical or electromechanical resection techniques.

Results. Office hysteroscopy demonstrated high diagnostic and therapeutic efficiency, allowing removal of small EP (<20 mm) in outpatient settings, while larger EP required in-hospital electromechanical resection. Most EP were single (76.8%), small to medium-sized (≤2 cm, 79.3%), and localized mainly on the posterior and lateral uterine walls. Histologically, EP were predominantly glandular-fibrous (59.8%) or glandular (37.8%), with 2.4% being adenomatous (atypical). The majority of postmenopausal EP were asymptomatic (67.1%). No significant intraoperative complications were reported. Organ-preserving surgical techniques were effective and safe, with polypectomy success rates exceeding 96%.

Conclusions. EP in postmenopausal women are often asymptomatic, highlighting the importance of early detection via TVUS and hysteroscopy. Office hysteroscopy enables minimally invasive, effective treatment of small EP, whereas larger EP require electromechanical resection. A combined imaging and histological evaluation optimize patient management, reduces the risk of recurrence, and supports preservation of reproductive and gynecological health.

The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The informed consent of the patients was obtained for conducting the studies.

The author declares the absence of conflict of interests.

References

Bensouda S, Cromack SC, Komorowski AS. (2025, Feb). Uterine pathology and microbiome among patients with endometrial EP and fibroids. F S Sci. 6(1): 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfss.2024.12.002; PMid:39710357

Cetin F, Kayar İ, Birge G. (2024, Oct 21). Malignancy risk factors based on endometrial polyp. BMC Womens Health. 24(1): 567. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03406-3; PMid:39434154 PMCid:PMC11492711

Ciscato A, Zare SY, Fadare O. (2020, Jun). The significance of recurrence in endometrial EP: a clinicopathologic analysis. Hum Pathol. 100: 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2020.03.005; PMid:32334830

Hu Y, Xiang Y, Huang W. (2023, Dec). Endometrial EP effect on pregnancy outcomes in infertile women with minimal/mild endometriosis: A retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 49(12): 2946-2951. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15794; PMid:37723936

Khalafli KhN, Taghieva FSh, Ragimov DzhA et al. (2024). Main tendencies in the dynamics of the population of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan Medical Journal. 2: 116-122. https//doi.org/10.34921/amj. 2024.4.018.

Koç N, Ertürk Coşkun AD. (2024, Sep). Glandular Crowdings in Endometrial EP: Clinical Follow-Up and Possible Worrisome Features. Int J Surg Pathol. 32(6): 1074-1081. https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969231213395; PMid:38062647

Koduru P, Sahoo SS, Aguilar M et al. (2023, Feb). Endometrial EP-Are They Characterized by HMGA Rearrangements or Not? Reply to Bullerdiek et al. Mod Pathol. 36(2): 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100058; PMid:36853779

Nazari L, Vahdat M, Rokhgireh S et al. (2024, Nov 8). HPV infection and endometrial EP: insights from a case-control study. BMC Womens Health. 24(1): 598. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03412-5; PMid:39516769 PMCid:PMC11546288

Ozyurt R, Turktekin N. (2022, May). Endometrial EP prevent embryo implantation via creatine and lactate pathways. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 26(9): 3278-3281. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202205_28746.

Raz N, Feinmesser L, Moore O, Haimovich S. (2021, Oct). Endometrial EP: diagnosis and treatment options - a review of literature // J. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies. 30(5): 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2021.1948867; PMid:34355659

Tekin S, Ocal A, Sisman E, Bilginer C, Cetin A. (2024, Apr). Histological assessment of endometrial EP resected by hysteroscopy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 28(8): 3241-3250. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202404_36052.

Vitale SG, Haimovich S, Laganà A et al. (2021, May). From the Global Community of Hysteroscopy Guidelines Committee. Endometrial EP. An evidence-based diagnosis and management guide. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 260: 70-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.017; PMid:33756339

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28