The relationship between staffing of the obstetrics and gynecology service and indicators of detection of cervical dysplasia in Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2025.4(104).59

Keywords:

cervical dysplasia, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, obstetricians-gynecologists, personnel support, physician workload, health care organization

Abstract

Cervical dysplasia is one of the leading precancerous pathologies of the female reproductive system and an important marker of the effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention. Timely detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia depends not only on biological and behavioral factors, but also on organizational aspects of medical care, in particular, the staffing of obstetrician-gynecologists.

Aim - to assess the relationship between the number of obstetrician-gynecologists and cervical dysplasia detection rates in Ukraine in 2020-2024.

Materials and methods. The research was conducted using official depersonalized statistical data. The material was summarized in tables on the incidence of cervical dysplasia and the number of obstetrician-gynecologists in Ukraine. The analysis covered the period 2020-2024, with 2020 (II-IV quarters) and 2025 (I quarter) considered as incomplete reporting periods. Statistical data processing was carried out using methods of descriptive statistics with the calculation of absolute and relative indicators and the load indicator - the number of cases of dysplasia per doctor.

Results. During the period from 2020 to 2024, the absolute number of registered cases of cervical dysplasia in Ukraine increased from 20,852 in 2020 II-IV quarters to 67,620 in 2024. Mild forms of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia CIN I - 48.0-52.5%, moderate CIN II - 18.9-21.5%, severe CIN III - 8.5-10.3% prevailed in all years, with no pronounced upward trend. Against the background of increasing morbidity, there was a reduction in the number of obstetrician-gynecologists by more than 14%, which was accompanied by an increase in the burden of cervical dysplasia per doctor from 1.9 cases in 2020 to 7.2 cases in 2024.

Conclusions. The results of the study indicate a relationship between staffing of the obstetrics and gynecology service and indicators of cervical dysplasia. A decrease in the number of obstetrician-gynecologists combined with an increase in the burden on doctors can negatively affect the availability and completeness of diagnosis, especially for severe forms of cervical dysplasia.

The author declares the absence of a conflict of interest.

References

Akimenko VV, Adi-Kusumo F. (2021). Stability analysis of an age-structured model of cervical cancer cells and HPV dynamics. Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE. 18(5): 6155-6177. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021308; PMid:34517528

Hrynevych OY. (2025). Human papillomavirus: problems and prospects for women's reproductive health (systematic review). Polski merkuriusz lekarski : organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego. 53(4): 546-554. https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202504117; PMid:40929547

Perkins RB, Guido RL, Saraiya M, Sawaya GF, Wentzensen N et al. (2021, Jan). Summary of Current Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Abnormal Test Results: 2016-2020. Journal of women's health. (Larchmt). 30(1): 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8918; PMid:33464997 PMCid:PMC8020523

Perkins RB, Wentzensen N, Guido RS, Schiffman M. (2023). Cervical Cancer Screening: A Review. JAMA. 330(6): 547-558. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.13174; PMid:37552298

Semenov VV, Kriachkova LV, Boată AE, Geantă MM. (2025). Trends in cervical cancer epidemiology and vaccination coverage in Ukraine. Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960). 78(5): 999-1005. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/205358; PMid:40526650

Shastri SS, Temin S, Almonte M, Basu P, Campos NG, Gravitt PE et al. (2022). Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline Update. JCO global oncology. 8: e2200217. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00217; PMid:36162041 PMCid:PMC9812449

Vale DB, Teixeira JC, Bragança JF, Derchain S, Sarian LO, Zeferino LC. (2021). Elimination of cervical cancer in low- and middle-income countries: Inequality of access and fragile healthcare systems. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 152(1): 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13458; PMid:33128771

Wentzensen N, Chirenje ZM, Prendiville W. (2021). Treatment approaches for women with positive cervical screening results in low-and middle-income countries. Preventive medicine. 144: 106439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106439; PMid:33678236

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28