Predictive factors for successful labor induction in women with premature rupture of membranes: a retrospective analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2025.2(102).4146

Keywords:

premature rupture of membranes, labor induction, perinatal outcomes, logistic regression analysis, prediction

Abstract

Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is a significant complication that affects perinatal outcomes, particularly in preterm pregnancies. PROM has serious consequences for both maternal and fetal health, as it disrupts the essential physiological role of amniotic fluid in protecting the fetus and supporting its development, while also increasing the risk of infections and other complications. In modern perinatology, this issue is one of the leading causes of preterm birth and perinatal mortality.

Induction of labor in the case of PROM is an important measure to minimize the risk of infections and complications for both the mother and the child. However, the success of this process depends on numerous factors, including the condition of both the mother and the fetus.

Aim - to identify the key factors influencing the effectiveness of labor induction in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and assess their impact on the success of the induction.

Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 79 clinical cases of pregnant women with PROM. Parameters such as age, body mass index (BMI), and fetal weight were considered in the study. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictive factors for successful labor induction.

Results. It was established that a higher BMI, greater fetal weight, and maternal age were associated with a decreased likelihood of successful labor induction. The obtained data were confirmed by logistic regression analysis, indicating a significant impact of these factors on the prediction of induction outcomes.

Conclusions. Age, BMI, and fetal weight are key risk factors for unsuccessful labor induction in women with PROM. The results can be used to provide a personalized approach to managing such patients and optimizing labor management strategies.

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the institution. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

ACOG. (2020, Mar). Prelabor Rupture of Membranes. ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 217. Obstet Gynecol. 135(3): e80-e97. PMID: 32080050. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003700

Alavifard S, Meier K, Shulman Y, Tomlinson G, D'Souza R. (2019, Apr 16). Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 19(1): 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2232-8; PMid:30991983 PMCid:PMC6469110

Bergholt T, Skjeldestad FE, Pyykönen A, Rasmussen SC, Tapper AM, Bjarnadóttir RI et al. (2020, Feb). Maternal age and risk of cesarean section in women with induced labor at term-A Nordic register-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 99(2): 283-289. Epub 2019 Nov 25. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13743; PMid:31583694

Bogaerts A, Witters I, Van den Bergh BRH, Jans G, Devlieger R. (2013). Obesity in pregnancy: Altered onset and progression of labour. Midwifery. 29(12): 1303-1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.013; PMid:23427851

Carlson NS, Hernandez TL, Hurt KJ. (2015, Dec 18). Parturition dysfunction in obesity: time to target the pathobiology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 13: 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0129-6; PMid:26684329 PMCid:PMC4683915

Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM et al. (2018). Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. New England Journal of Medicine. 379(6): 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800566; PMid:30089070 PMCid:PMC6186292

Kamlungkuea T, Manonai J, Suriyawongpaisal P, Hansahiranwadee W. (2022). Factors Predicting Successful Vaginal Delivery Following Induction of Labor in Term Pregnancy. Int J Womens Health. 14: 245-255. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S347878; PMid:35221727 PMCid:PMC8865869

Korb D, Goffinet F, Seco A, Chevret S, Deneux-Tharaux C. (2019). Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 191(13): E352-E360. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181067; PMid:30936165 PMCid:PMC6443524

Ministerstvo okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy. (2023). Pro zatverdzhennia reiestru hranychnykh optovo-vidpusknykh tsin na likarski zasoby stanom na 01 lypnia 2019 roku. Nakaz MOZ Ukrainy vid 01.07.2019 No. 1533. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1533282-23.

Ministerstvo okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy. (2006). Pro zatverdzhennia Instruktsii z vyznachennia kryteriiv perynatalnoho periodu, zhyvonarodzhenosti ta mertvonarodzhenosti, Poriadku reiestratsii zhyvonarodzhenykh i mertvonarodzhenykh. Nakaz Ministerstvf okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy vid 29.03.2006 No.179. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/z0427-06.

Odame Anto E, Owiredu WKBA, Sakyi SA, Turpin CA, Ephraim RKD, Fondjo LA et al. (2018, Jul 17). Adverse pregnancy outcomes and imbalance in angiogenic growth mediators and oxidative stress biomarkers is associated with advanced maternal age births: A prospective cohort study in Ghana. PLoS One. 13(7): e0200581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200581; PMid:30016351 PMCid:PMC6049923

Rademaker D, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Pampus MG. (2021). Adverse maternal and perinatal pregnan cy outcomes related to very advanced maternal age in primigravida and multigravida in the Netherlands: A population‐based cohort. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 100(5): 941-948. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14064; PMid:33314021

Tyshko KM, Hnatko OP. (2020). Osoblyvosti perebihu polohiv u vahitnykh z ozhyrinniam. Ukrainskyi naukovo-medychnyi molodizhnyi zhurnal. 1: 9-19. https://doi.org/10.32345/USMYJ.1(115).2020.9-17

Published

2025-06-28