Implementation of the Infection prevention and infection control program at the level of healthcare facility in Donetsk and Luhansk regions in 2021-2022 and prospects for recovery in the post-war period

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2024.4(100).2228

Keywords:

infection control, infection prevention, healthcare-associated infections

Abstract

The aim of the work was to assess the implementation of the Infection prevention and control (IPC) program and water supply, sanitation and hygiene programs in healthcare facilities in Donetsk and Luhansk regions and to assess the further development of these programs in the regions.

Materials and methods. To evaluate the implementation of the IPC program in health care institutions of Donetsk and Luhansk regions and to analyze the main trends and priority directions for the development of infection prevention programs at the level of health care facilities (HCF), two rounds of comprehensive evaluation of the IPC program at the level of health care facilities were conducted in 2021 and 2022 using the Infection prevention and control assessment framework (IPCAF) and Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH FIT) tools.

The assessment results showed that the implementation of the IPC in 11 HCF in Donetsk and Luhansk regions is at the basic level and in 6 HCF at an insufficient level (<200 points), the average value is 220,7 points, (95% confidence interval (CI 95%) 191.9 - 249.6 points). The least implemented component was Epidemiological surveillance for healthcare-associated infections (HAI) - 7.8 points (CI 95%: 2.6-13.0), Multimodal strategies - 10.6 points (CI 95%: 8.6-12.5) and IPC Monitoring - 18.1 (CI 95%: 14.0 - 22.2). The most implemented components of the IPC were the IPC Infrastructure 53.7 points (95% CI: 46.3 - 61.1). The assessment of water supply, sanitation and hygiene services showed similar results of the implementation of these services in the HCF of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, the average indicator was 52% (95% CI: 49.9-54.4). The most implemented were Energy Supply - 80% (95% CI: 74.7 - 84.9) and Water Supply - 69% (95% CI: 64.1-73.6).

Conclusions. The evaluation of the IPC program at the level of the HCF in 2021-2022 in Donetsk and Luhansk regions showed that the majority of HCF had a basic (64%) or insufficient level of implementation of IPC (36% of institutions). Implementation of water, sanitation and hygiene services was at the level of 49,9-54,4% of the recommended level. The conducted assessment helped to form the priority directions of the development of the IPC program in HCFs, particularly in the context of post-war reconstruction.

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

Aghdassi SJS, Grisold A, Wechsler-Fördös A, Hansen S, Bischoff P et al. (2020, Jun 22). Evaluating infection prevention and control programs in Austrian acute care hospitals using the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 9(1): 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00761-2; PMid:32571434 PMCid:PMC7309981

Aghdassi SJS, Hansen S, Bischoff P, Behnke M, Gastmeier P. (2019, May 8). A national survey on the implementation of key infection prevention and control structures in German hospitals: results from 736 hospitals conducting the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 8: 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0532-4; PMid:31080588 PMCid:PMC6505265

Azak E, Sertcelik A, Ersoz G et al. (2023). Evaluation of the implementation of WHO infection prevention and control core components in Turkish health care facilities: results from a WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework (IPCAF) - based survey. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 12: 11. URL: https://doi,org/10,1186/s13756-023-01208-0.

Jeong Y, Joo H, Bahk H, Koo H, Lee H, Kim K. (2022, May 13). A nationwide survey on the implementation of infection prevention and control components in 1442 hospitals in the Republic of Korea: comparison to the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 11(1): 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01107-w; PMid:35562838 PMCid:PMC9101985

Ng'ambi D, O'Byrne T, Jingini E, Chadwala H, Musopole O, Kamchedzera W et al. (2024, Aug 22). An assessment of infection prevention and control implementation in Malawian hospitals using the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) tool. Infect Prev Pract. 6(4): 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100388; PMid:39286836 PMCid:PMC11402029

Verkhovna rada Ukrainy. (2021). Pro orhanizatsiiu profilaktyky infektsii ta infektsiinoho kontroliu v zakladakh okhorony zdorov'ia ta ustanovakh/zakladakh nadannia sotsialnykh posluh/ sotsialnoho zakhystu naselennia. Ofitsiinyi Vebportal Parlamentu Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon,rada,gov,ua/laws/show/z1318-21#Text.

WHO. (2016). Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programmes at the national and acute healthcare facility level. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3,0 IGO.

WHO. (2018). Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework. World Health Organization. URL: https://www,who,int/publications/i/item/WHO-HIS-SDS-2018,9.

WHO. (2022). Water and Sanitation for Health Facility Improvement Tool (WASH FIT): a practical guide for improving quality of care through water, sanitation and hygiene in health care facilities, second edition. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BYNC-SA 3,0 IGO.

Published

2024-12-28