Women’s experience during the perinatal period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2023.94.51Keywords:
perinatal care, childbirth satisfaction, childbirth experience, womenAbstract
Perinatal experience is an important stage in the life of every mother and her child. The childbirth process can be a source of emotional satisfaction and strengthen the bond between the mother and the newborn baby. However, a negative childbirth experience can create feelings of fear towards future deliveries, the need for cesarean section, the risk of developing post-traumatic stress and postpartum depression, as well as problems with breastfeeding.
Purposе - to study the level of women’s satisfaction with childbirth in order to improve perinatal care.
Materials and methods. A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 321 mothers who completed the satisfaction scale for childbirth and delivery. Descriptive statistics were utilized for data analysis. It was found that the data distribution deviates from the normal distribution. The median value (Me) and the interquartile range (Q I - Q III) were calculated for the dataset.
Results. The satisfaction scale helped identify the advantages and disadvantages of the childbirth experience in four key aspects of vaginal delivery. 1. Own capacity: a) Advantages: 76% of women felt strong; 79.3% - felt confident; 67.4% - felt happy. b) Disadvantages: 54% - felt that their childbirth experience matched their plans; 76.2% - felt tired. 2. Professional support: a) Advantages: 86.8% - felt they received sufficient attention and information from their caregivers; 84.8% - felt a comfortable and warm atmosphere; 84.8% - felt their needs were understood; 89.3% - felt they received proper care and assistance; b) Disadvantages: None, as the majority of women felt satisfied with the professional support. 3. Perceived safety: a) Advantages: 86% - felt safe; 89% - had trust in the professional abilities of the healthcare team; 68% - had many positive memories, while 1% had many negative memories; b) Disadvantages: 31% - experienced a low level of anxiety, while 16% - experienced a high level of anxiety. 4. Participation: a) Advantages: 67% - had the opportunity to choose a pain relief method; 60% - had the opportunity to change positions, while 21% did not; 86% - felt they received sufficient attention and information from the medical team; b) Disadvantages: Some women did not have the opportunity to choose a pain relief method (33%) or change positions during childbirth (21%).
Conclusions. The study of women’s satisfaction with childbirth indicated the need for improvement in the aspect of «perceived safety». «Own capability», «professional support», and «participation» demonstrate high satisfaction, indicating the quality of perinatal care. The level of satisfaction can become a key indicator of the quality of perinatal care, contributing to the improvement of hospital efficiency assessment and quality of medical services».
The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The research protocol was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of the institution specified in the work. Informed consent for participation in the study was obtained from the women.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
References
Aziato L, Acheampong AK, Umoar KL. (2017). Labour pain experiences and perceptions: a qualitative study among post-partum women in Ghana. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 17: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1248-1; PMid:28228096 PMCid:PMC5322618
Beck CT. (2004). Birth trauma: In the eye of the beholder. Nursing Research. 53 (1): 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200401000-00005; PMid:14726774
Bell CH, Muggleton S, Davis DL. (2022). Birth plans: A systematic, integrative review into their purpose, process, and impact. Midwifery. 111: 103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103388; PMid:35640358
Boie S, Lauridsen HH, Glavind J, Smed MK, Uldbjerg N, Bor P. (2020). The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)-Validation of its use in a Danish-speaking population of new mothers stimulated with oxytocin during labour. PloS one. 15 (5): e0233122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233122; PMid:32407376 PMCid:PMC7224492
Carquillat P, Vendittelli F, Perneger T, Guittier MJ. (2017). Development of a questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 17 (1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1462-x; PMid:28854894 PMCid:PMC5577741
Chabbert M, Rozenberg P, Wendland J. (2021). Predictors of negative childbirth experiences among French women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 50 (4): 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2021.02.004; PMid:33676911
Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. (2010). Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): develop- ment and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 10 (1): 81. URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/ pdf/1471-2393-10-81.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-81; PMid:21143961 PMCid:PMC3008689
Fisher C, Hauck Y, Fenwick J. (2006). How social context impacts on women's fears of childbirth: A Western Australian example. Social Science & Medicine. 63 (1): 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.065; PMid:16476516 PMCid:PMC4010856
Ghanbari-Homayi S, Dencker A, Fardiazar Z, Jafarabadi MA, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Meedya S et al. (2019). Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 19: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2606-y; PMid:31801477 PMCid:PMC6894263
Hosseini Tabaghdehi M, Kolahdozan S, Keramat A, Shahhossein Z, Moosazadeh M, Motaghi Z. (2020). Prevalence and factors affecting the negative childbirth experiences: a systematic review. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 33 (22): 3849-3856. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1583740; PMid:30859845
Howard LM, Khalifeh H. (2020). Perinatal mental health: a review of progress and challenges. World Psychiatry. 19 (3): 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20769; PMid:32931106 PMCid:PMC7491613
Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC. (2006). Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 176 (4): 455-460. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050812; PMid:16076823 PMCid:PMC1180658
Kuo TC, Au HK, Chen SR, Chipojola R, Lee GT, Lee PH, Kuo SY. (2022). Effects of an integrated childbirth education program to reduce fear of childbirth, anxiety, and depression, and improve dispositional mindfulness: A single-blind randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 113: 103438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103438; PMid:35963072
Lok KY, Fan HS, Ko RW, Kwok JY, Wong JY, Fong DY et al. (2022). Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 22 (1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x; PMid:35168552 PMCid:PMC8845391
McKelvin G, Thomson G, Downe S. (2021). The childbirth experience: A systematic review of predictors and outcomes. Women and Birth. 34 (5): 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.021; PMid:33039281
McKelvin G, Thomson G, Downe S. (2021). The childbirth experience: A systematic review of predictors and outcomes. Women and Birth. 34 (5): 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.021; PMid:33039281
Moxon SG, Ruysen H, Kerber KJ, Amouzou A, Fournier S, Grove J et al. (2015). Count every newborn; a measurement improvement roadmap for coverage data. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 15 (2): S8. URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/15/S2/S8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S8; PMid:26391444 PMCid:PMC4577758
Nilsson C, Hessman E, Sjöblom H, Dencker A, Jangsten E, Mollberg M et al. (2018). Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 18: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7; PMid:29329526 PMCid:PMC5766978
Sando D, Abuya T, Asefa A et al. (2017). Methods used in prevalence studies of disrespect and abuse during facility based childbirth: lessons learned. Reprod Health. 14: 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0389-z; PMid:29020966 PMCid:PMC5637332
Soriano-Vidal FJ, Oliver-Roig A, Cabrero-García J, Congost-Maestre N, Dencker A, Richart-Martínez M. (2016). The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment. BMC. Pregnancy and Childbirth. 16 (1): 372. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z; PMid:27884123 PMCid:PMC5123212
Tzeng YL, Yang YL, Kuo PC, Lin YC, Chen SL. (2017). Pain, anxiety, and fatigue during labor: a prospective, repeated measures study. Journal of Nursing Research. 25 (1): 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000165; PMid:28072678
Vogels-Broeke M, de Vries R, Nieuwenhuijze M. (2020). Dimensions in women's experience of the perinatal period. Midwifery. 83: 102602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102602; PMid:31882183
Walker KF, Dencker A, Thornton JG. (2020). Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: validating its use in the United Kingdom. European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology. X; 5: 100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097; PMid:32021972 PMCid:PMC6994391
Walker KF, Wilson P, Bugg GJ, Dencker A, Thornton JG. (2015). Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom. BMC. Pregnancy and Childbirth. 15: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0513-4; PMid:25884191 PMCid:PMC4396591
Werner-Bierwisch T, Pinkert C, Niessen K, Metzing S, Hellmers C. (2018). Mothers' and fathers' sense of security in the context of pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period: an integrative literature review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 18: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2096-3; PMid:30509217 PMCid:PMC6278054
WHO. (2011). Countdown to 2015. Monitoring maternal, newborn and child health: understanding key progress indicators. Geneva: World Health Organization. URL: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44770/1/9789241502818_eng.pdf. (accessed 20 July 2017).
WHO. (2016). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259947/WHO-RHR-18.02-eng.pdf.
WHO. (2017). Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health (2016-2030) data portal. Geneva: World Health Organization. URL: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.gswcah. (accessed 20 July 2017).
WHO. (2018). WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization. URL: https://books.google.pl/books?hl=uk&lr=&id=hHOyDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=who+intrapartum+care&ots=edEmVfHxPc&sig=9ltmHhsPg5ije6grUR5c1hme3O8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=who%20intrapartum%20care&f=false.
Yurashevich M, Carvalho B, Butwick AJ, Ando K, Flood PD. (2019). Determinants of women's dissatisfaction with anaesthesia care in labour and delivery. Anaesthesia. 74 (9): 1112-1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14756; PMid:31264207
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The policy of the Journal “Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics” is compatible with the vast majority of funders' of open access and self-archiving policies. The journal provides immediate open access route being convinced that everyone – not only scientists - can benefit from research results, and publishes articles exclusively under open access distribution, with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 international license(СС BY-NC).
Authors transfer the copyright to the Journal “MODERN PEDIATRICS. UKRAINE” when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors declare that this manuscript has not been published nor is under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. After publication, the articles become freely available on-line to the public.
Readers have the right to use, distribute, and reproduce articles in any medium, provided the articles and the journal are properly cited.
The use of published materials for commercial purposes is strongly prohibited.