Perinatal consequences of innovative tactics for the treatment of recurrent miscarriage in isthmic-cervical insufficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15574/PP.2023.94.42Keywords:
miscarriage, preterm birth, isthmic-cervical insufficiency, transabdominal cerclage, transvaginal cerclageAbstract
Purpose - to improve the effectiveness of the treatment of miscarriage due to isthmic-cervical insufficiency (ICI) by using improved management tactics for women at high risk of ICI.
Materials and methods. A two-stage innovating tactic for the treatment of miscarriage caused by ICI was proposed, including the prediction of the ineffectiveness of vaginal cerclage and the implementation of transabdominal cerclage in certain groups of patients. Starting from the pregravid stage, 30 women at risk of ICI were examined, which were conducted according to the developed scheme. 2 patients with a history of failed vaginal cerclage had abdominal cerclage prior to pregnancy and had not yet become pregnant at the time of writing. In 28 remaining women, the course and results of pregnancy were monitored. 3 patients after trachelectomy for cervical cancer were given abdominal cerclage in early pregnancy. 23 pregnant women were subjected to vaginal cerclage prophylactically or for sonographic or physical indications, these women constituted the main group for evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed treatment regimen for miscarriage in ICI. The comparison group consisted of 80 women with intravaginal cerclage, who were managed according to the protocols of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine.
Results. The effectiveness of the proposed tactics for the treatment of miscarriage caused by ICI reflects the frequency of miscarriage and its structure. No cases of late miscarriages were observed. The rate of preterm birth significantly decreased from 37.5% to 21.7% (p<0.05), while no cases of early preterm birth (before 28 weeks) were observed. In the structure of miscarriage, 80.0% is the proportion of preterm births at 34-36 weeks of gestation (against 35.5%; p<0.05). The frequency of premature rupture of membranes decreased by 4 times (8.7% vs. 36.3%; p<0.05). The frequency of birth of children in a state of asphyxia decreased by more than 2 times (17.4% vs. 43.4%; p<0.05), and there was not a single case of birth in a state of severe asphyxia. The incidence of complications in the early neonatal period decreased by 20% (43.5% vs. 63.2%; p<0.05), mainly due to a decrease in the frequency of such dangerous complications as respiratory distress syndrome (13.0% vs. 31.6%; p<0.05) and disorders of central nervous system (17.4% vs. 44.7%; p<0.05).
Conclusions. The use of the proposed tactics for the treatment of miscarriage caused by CI made it possible to significantly reduce the frequency of miscarriage and improve its structure, avoid cases of spontaneous miscarriages and neonatal deaths, improve the condition of newborns, which makes it possible to recommend the introduction of this tactic in the practical work of obstetric and gynecological institutions.
The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the participating institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies.
No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
References
Alas QMDA, Lee CL, Kuo HH, Huang CY, Yen CF. (2020, Aug). Interval Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cervical Cerclage (ILTACC) Using Needleless Mersilene Tape for Cervical Incompetence. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 9 (3):145-149. https://doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_90_19; PMid:33101915 PMCid:PMC7545039
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. (2017, Jun 6). Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 6 (6): CD008991. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3; PMid:28586127
ACOG. (2014, Feb). Practice Bulletin No. 142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 123; 2 (1): 372-379. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc; PMid:24451674
Bayrak M, Gul A, Goynumer G. (2017, May). Rescue cerclage when foetal membranes prolapse into the vagina. J Obstet Gynaecol. 37 (4): 471-475. Epub 2017 Jan 31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2016.1268574; PMid:28141950
Brown R, Gagnon R, Delisle MF. (2019, Feb). No. 373 - Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 41 (2): 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.009; PMid:30638557
Clark NV, Einarsson JI. (2020, Apr). Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a highly effective option for refractory cervical insufficiency. Fertil Steril. 113 (4): 717-722. Epub 2020 Mar 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.007; PMid:32147177
Crihfield EG, Shibata R, Moskowitz O, Rodriguez-Ayala G, Nimaroff ML. (2020, May). Transabdominal cerclage for managing recurrent pregnancy loss. OBG Manag. 32 (5): 36-38, 40-42. URL: https://www.mdedge.com/obgyn/article/221832/obstetrics/transabdominal-cerclage-managing-recurrent-pregnancy-loss.
Dawood F, Farquharson RG. (2016, Apr). Transabdominal cerclage: preconceptual versus first trimester insertion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 199: 27-31. Epub 2016 Feb 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.035; PMid:26896593
Drassinower D, Coviello E, Landy HJ, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Perez-Delboy A, Friedman AM. (2019, Mar). Outcomes after periviable ultrasound-indicated cerclage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 32 (6): 932-938. Epub 2017 Nov 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1395848; PMid:29108444
Kim S, Hill A, Menderes G, Cross S, Azodi M, Bahtiyar MO. (2018, Jun). Minimally invasive abdominal cerclage compared to laparotomy: a comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes. J Robot Surg. 12 (2): 295-301. Epub 2017 Jul 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0726-9; PMid:28721634
Lee KN, Whang EJ, Chang KH, Song JE, Son GH, Lee KY. (2018, Jan). History-indicated cerclage: the association between previous preterm history and cerclage outcome. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 61 (1): 23-29. Epub 2017 Dec 14. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.23; PMid:29372146 PMCid:PMC5780317
Moawad GN, Tyan P, Bracke T, Abi Khalil ED, Vargas V, Gimovsky A, Marfori C. (2018, Feb). Systematic Review of Transabdominal Cerclage Placed via Laparoscopy for the Prevention of Preterm Birth. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 25 (2):277-286. Epub 2017 Aug 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.021; PMid:28797657
Shennan AH, Manju Ch, Bennett P, David AL, Girling J, Ridout A et al. (2018, Dec 29). MAVRIC: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial of Transabdominal versus Transvaginal Cervical Cerclage. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307633. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3307633
Sneider K, Christiansen OB, Sundtoft IB, Langhoff-Roos J. (2017, Apr). Recurrence rates after abdominal and vaginal cerclages in women with cervical insufficiency: a validated cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 295 (4): 859-866. Epub 2017 Feb 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4315-y; PMid:28233116
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The policy of the Journal “Ukrainian Journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics” is compatible with the vast majority of funders' of open access and self-archiving policies. The journal provides immediate open access route being convinced that everyone – not only scientists - can benefit from research results, and publishes articles exclusively under open access distribution, with a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 international license(СС BY-NC).
Authors transfer the copyright to the Journal “MODERN PEDIATRICS. UKRAINE” when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors declare that this manuscript has not been published nor is under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. After publication, the articles become freely available on-line to the public.
Readers have the right to use, distribute, and reproduce articles in any medium, provided the articles and the journal are properly cited.
The use of published materials for commercial purposes is strongly prohibited.